Central claims
A central answer needs a current official source, a current observable source plus an independent current source, or two independent current observable sources that agree. Search snippets and AI summaries do not become gameplay proof.
Community evidence
Player reports can expose demand, failure patterns, and possible solutions. One report remains a report. Votes show attention or agreement, not automatic factual correctness.
Conflicts
When current sources disagree, the site states the conflict or withholds the page. It does not let AI choose the more convenient answer. That is why a codes page is absent from this version.
Updates and testing
Every guide shows its review date and scope. The site currently relies on public sources and does not claim owned gameplay testing. The live in-game UI outranks an older guide after a patch.
Corrections
Factual, security, indexing, and broken-link problems should be corrected immediately. New routes require a separate player task and a passed source gate.